Spatial ecology deals with the spatial distribution of organisms and a general objective of spatial analysis is to reveal the relationship between observed spatial distributions of species and the mechanisms underlying these spatial distributions. The recent advances in analysing spatial patterns of organisms in spatial ecology have greatly contributed to better understanding the distribution of organisms in space and time.
A prerequisite for exploring the ecological information provided by spatial distributions of organisms is to precisely describe the spatial structure of point patterns with statistical methods. Over the past decades, statisticians have developed structurally different summary statistics for this purpose. Moreover, rapid advances in computer science and technology have resulted in an increased application of spatial statistics. In addition, development of remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) technology has led to the identification of spatiotemporal patterns of organisms and has increased the possibility to identify how human activities have influenced animal and plant habitats. Consequently, ecologists have started to introduce spatial variation and complexity of ecosystems into their analyses, including changes of spatial patterns over time.
The widespread application of spatial analysis in ecological studies makes it possible to consider special parts in IALE World Congresses or related topics in IALE Annual Conferences and prepare special issues to be published by technical journals (e.g., Ecological Modelling, Spatial Statistics). 2026 UpdateIn 2025, the IALE Working Group on Spatial Analysis of Ecosystems reached significant milestones in advancing the integration of high-resolution remote sensing (HR-RS) into forest spatial ecology. A major achievement was the publication of a comprehensive systematic review synthesizing how HR-RS technologies, including LiDAR and aerial imagery, provide critical insights into ecological processes at the single-tree level (Erfanifard et al., 2025a). This work highlighted the growing capability of these tools to capture complex tree-tree interactions and tree-environment relationships that were previously difficult to quantify across large spatial extents. Complementing this theoretical synthesis, the group published a pivotal case study evaluating these technologies in the Białowieża Forest (Erfanifard et al., 2025b). This research demonstrated that HR-RS provides a new lens for biodiversity assessment, offering reliable canopy species diversity data that aligns with traditional field-based measurements while providing superior spatial coverage. In parallel, the WG made significant steps in refining spatial indicators and modeling forest dynamics. A core focus was the development of robust biodiversity metrics, exemplified by the generalization of the spatial species mingling diversity index (Pommerening and Särkkä, 2025). This advancement offers a robust way to quantify local neighborhood structures, significantly reducing dependency on global species richness and improving the ecological plausibility of diversity monitoring. Research also deepened into regeneration processes by modeling the colonization of mountain birch saplings, providing spatial insights into how performance at the forest edge shapes ecosystem shifts (Behrend and Pommerening, 2025). Furthermore, the group addressed the management-ecology nexus by synthesizing the historical origins of modern Continuous Cover Forestry (CCF) in Europe, illustrating how historical spatial paradigms inform contemporary efforts to maintain structural complexity (Pommerening et al., 2025). These 2025 contributions directly support the WG mission to increase the application of spatial analysis among scientists investigating ecological dynamics. By filling the gap between advanced statistical modeling and practical forest management, these studies provide the spatial signatures necessary for biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Looking forward to 2026, the WG aims to integrate these findings into upcoming activities, focusing on translating these complex spatial metrics into accessible tools for the broader landscape ecology community. References
Contact
Yousef Erfanifard, PhD (WG leader) Arne Pommerening, PhD (Co-WG leader) Other Members:
| News
Bulletin |